what is it with the left and violence

Posted on April 9, 2011 | 30 Comments

I just read this story regarding the threats made against Wisconsin Senators. The woman in the story is one sick puppy, yet she has been released on her own recognizance!!

So, what is it with the left and their extreme violence?

This entry was posted in left wing violence. Bookmark the permalink.

30 responses to “what is it with the left and violence”

← Older Comments
  1. Aussie | April 10, 2011 at 7:21 pm |

    indymac | April 10, 2011 at 7:46 am | | Edit
    Indy take the second option 🙂

    The lefties hated it being there because of course it was staffed by Americans and it was spying on their Communist friends.

    They used to have regular protests and they used to try to storm the place, attempting to climb the fences.

    Like

  2. CRB | April 11, 2011 at 6:03 am |

    indymac | April 10, 2011 at 6:15 am |
    CRB, your comments are some of the more thought-provoking I’ve seen and I especially appreciate your enlightenment regarding psychology of political persuasion as well as cognitive infiltration of the blogosphere.

    ++++++++++

    Indy, I’ve posted this at CW’s several times over the years. The problem is no sooner than I post it, those who shall remain nameless bury it in a flurry of 100’s of unrelated comments. Thus, most don’t get to see it.

    The thing about psy-ops is they are countered the moment one is made aware of them actually taking place. However, psy-ops are subtle and subjective by nature. So once such an individual’s awareness is re-directed, normally through emotional knee jerking (Ex. argumentum ad hominem tactics) they keep falling into the same manipulative trap over and over again.

    Thus once an individual figures out the Psy-op patterns, they have to train themselves to always control their emotional discomfiture’s on a consistent basis, even if it goes completely against innate “Feeling” (F) Temperament natures. For most people of the “Feeling” Temperament types, this normally a long hard process to master.

    Those of the “Thinking” (T) Temperament types do not have this particular psychological weakness. It is therefore far easier for the “Thinking” types to dismiss the emotional excreta of any argument, debate, and whatnot. Thus why they also do not fall for the ad hominem tactics, and start arguing with those whom rely upon using it, or any other form of emotional knee jerk stances.

    As for Pine Gap… I personaly can not confirm nor deny anything on the subject. However, Aussi can say whatever she wants. Take whatever she says about it at pretty much face value.

    Like

  3. Aussie | April 11, 2011 at 6:33 am |

    @CRB, I love the “I cannot confirm or deny, but take Aussie at face value response”… chuckle.
    Here in Oz we were well aware of the activities of Pine Gap, thanks to the media and the Commie protesters (we ignored them but the press loved them).

    The protesters were doing the work of the Soviet Union and China with their disruption 🙂

    Like

  4. CRB | April 11, 2011 at 6:43 am |

    It’s called “Legally Covering My Ass!!!….LOL!!!

    Like

  5. Aussie | April 11, 2011 at 6:47 am |

    CRB | April 11, 2011 at 6:43 am | | Edit
    Yes, and too true.
    This is why I cannot understand how Bradley Manning ended up in a position where he had the ability to steal those emails, and that he ignored the oath he took, let alone how he was posted to a role that required secrecy.

    Like

  6. CRB | April 11, 2011 at 7:02 am |

    Aussie | April 11, 2011 at 6:47 am |
    Bradley Manning ended up in a position where he had the ability to steal those emails
    ++++++++++
    Let’s just say he is a “Fall Guy” for Authorities well above my pay grade. His Security Clearance at the time was still within the “Adjudication” stages. There is no way in Hades he would have been given such access to SCI enclave protected materials… Unless, those far above him mysteriously granted such access for nefarious reasons.

    You do know BM was/is a British Citizen, and would NEVER be cleared for the type and level of SCI access he had. Much like another “Alleged” British Citizen we love to hate.

    Like

  7. CRB | April 12, 2011 at 2:08 pm |

    Aussi;
    If you would like, you can make Psychological Warfare 101 into a topic of it’s own. Just let me know if you wish to. I will have to make some edits to it before such a time., then E-mail it to you to post as such. I can say no more than I already have on the Bradley Manning and Alice Springs subjects than I have… You should be the “Local Expert on the whole Alice Springs thing… I’m sure there will be a slew of questions pertaining to it….LOL!

    Like

  8. Aussie | April 12, 2011 at 2:35 pm |

    @CRB yes, I am interested in your topic. Do you have my email?

    Like

  9. Aussie | April 12, 2011 at 2:41 pm |

    CRB | April 11, 2011 at 7:02 am
    Let’s just say that I know enough to understand that Manning and Østupid should not have had that high a security clearance since both are dual citizens.

    I simply do not understand why the LSM and the lying liberals/progressives do not get it – that is a dual citizen is not allowed to have access to the button, or to other military equipment for that matter.

    You could be right, that Manning did not act alone. In fact it is so suspicious as to how he managed to upload to Wikileaks so many documents that other individuals who were probably trying to harm GWB must be involved.

    Like

  10. CRB | April 12, 2011 at 2:43 pm |

    No, I do not, and you don’t have mine either. I use different e-mail addresses for different things. I never give out my “Real one” for obvious security reasons, considering the field I work in, and who I work for…LOL!

    Like

← Older Comments