I just found this article over at American Thinker. Personally, I believe Jayna Davis and her account of what went down. There were other persons “unknown” who participated in that bombing. They were Iraqi soldiers. Hussein al-Husseini was a former Saddam Hussein elite guard and his name has been circulating as the third bomber.
This angle was never investigated by the FBI. Why? Well I can think of one good reason. In the days of Slick Willy’s Presidency there was a meme of the angry White Men. This goes back to Waco and Ruby Ridge. McVeigh was a witness to, but not involved with the Waco slayings by the FBI, and I am not surprised that he was so very angry. It meant that McVeigh was ripe to be used by other more nefarious persons to do evil. One could almost hint that the FBI were out to get him. However, looking beyond that point you have Janet Reno (who also turned a little boy over to the Cuban authorities) who was responsible for the meme about homeschoolers being bad, and about militia being the terrorists.
Well, so far there has not been any real evidence that the majority involved in the militia movement are terrorists. The Southern Poverty Law Centre happens to be an absolute joke in my view. It contains a lot of wrong information about what they determine as “hate groups” and they miss the obvious – ACORN and its affiliates as well as the various anarchists that exist in the USA. The SPLC has information that is simply not credible, such as information on a group that does not exist in Rhode Island (see Legal Insurrection for more details on the subject)
In other words, who ordered the FBI not to investigate John Doe #2? I am betting that it was Slick Willy who shut down any investigation even though there were eye witnesses who could pin point the person who actually helped Terry Nichols build the bomb. Keep in mind that Terry Nichols has an affiliate in the Philipines who is or was involved with the Filipino version of Al Qaeda.
The only way that justice will be served for the 171 people who died in the Murrah building is for an investigation into John Doe #2 which is open and honest and no political correctness.
The comments have provided sufficient food for thought. I recommend the link provided by Indy. It seems that everything seems to tie back to the Soviet Union, and that includes the links to Saddam Hussein as well as to Libya, and the PLO.
The Soviet Union was using Yasser Arafat to get at the USA but making it look like the Russians were not involved. Saddam Hussein had links to the PLO and was a sponsor of their terrorist activities. The Soviet Union had supplied WMDs to Saddam Hussein and even showed him how to hide the weapons. Kamel Hussein who defected to Egypt provided a lot of information that netted a lot of those Iraqi weapons, and then Kamel was lured back to Iraq where he and his family were brutally killed. After that point Saddam Hussein refused to cooperate with the International Community, and all the time the Russians were obsfucating and putting obstacles in the way of taking action.
The Soviet Union was also a backer of Gadhafi in Libya. People seem to forget that Gadhafi was a vey big sponsor in terrorism. Only recently we have been reminded that Gadhafi also sponsored the terrorism of the IRA in Northern Ireland. Yet behind Gadhafi stands the Soviet Union. In this case you have payback against the British Government.
Think about this as a scenario – PLO – at the time of the bombing in Oklahoma City the PLO were in negotiation with the OSLO 2 Treaty. Clinton needed to get that treaty signed. If word got out that M.E. agents were involved in the bombing of the Murrah building, then the signing of the OSLO 2 Treaty would be torpedoed. This would have destroyed the original plans of Yasser Arafat and the Soviet Union to deceive the rest of the world, and in particular the USA regarding the intentions of Yasser Arafat.
I do not know if the scenario is correct, but for now these are the dots that I have been connecting.