psyops 101

The Tradecraft of Psychological Warfare 101

 

Useful Idiots: as Uri Bezmenovin, in his 1984 interview with G. Edward Griffin defined:

 

“You can’t get through to them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern [alluding to Pavlov]. You cannot change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still cannot change the basic perception and the logic of behavior. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. .he will refuse to believe it.”

 

The following is documented proven scientific fact for many years now. Please feel free to look anything up and educate yourselves if you so desire. Areas to reference are: Pavlov’s Conditioning/Response, Psychology and Temperament, Neurochemistry, Neurophysiology, Sociology, Rhetoric and Composition. 

I:  Intellectual Classes, the young, and inexperienced:

 

It is a known and fundamental fact the higher an individual’s IQ, the more susceptible they are to covert subliminal and/or overt suggestion. The simplest explanation, without getting all scientific I can come up with is that raw Intelligence (IQ = pure intellect and book smarts) is directly and inversely proportional to raw Wisdom (common sense, experience, and practical application of knowledge.) It is through this known neurological process that the basis of Psychological Warfare was developed and implemented over the decades. I could write you a huge essay explaining all this, but I’m going to try to keep it as simple as possible for everybody’s benefit.

 

Starting with history, you will remember just how Communism was spread and came into power during the years leading up to the cold war by utilizing these methods of psychological warfare. In utilizing this known neurological fact, psy-ops were specifically tailored toward the young/inexperienced and the Intellectual (egg head high IQ folks) classes of society.

 

Although it is far easier to indoctrinate the young throughout their lives and as they grow into adults. This kind of indoctrination is just as easy to accomplish with an already adult Intellectual class. The why is because intellectuals in general tend to be so enamored with their perceived brilliance and brain power, all they are really good at is theorizing and fantasizing. Most of the intellectuals with the high IQs are in all reality very bad at common sense matters and putting their theories into some form of applied practical application. But because they are as prone to this type of mental masturbation as I call it, this also plays into their susceptibility to covert subliminal programming, and overt suggestion.

 

They are the Classes whom were exploited to believe and spread an ideology would be Utopian. In so doing they are the ones that revel in bringing about social and societal change, although it is a fundamental delusion that any such Utopian existence or Society can exist simply because of basic human nature. It does not matter how “Enlightened” mankind or it’s Societies may be, it is impossible to bring about or sustain any Utopian existence without first stomping out any variations of Individuality, Independent Thought, Morality, and even Ethics. This is of course an absolute impossibility unless the entire world population was exact and identical clones of each other.

 

With that said the Intellectual Classes are also usually the first group of people to realize that such concepts as Marxism and Communism are not as good, fair, or socially just as they fantasized about when the proverbial crap hits the fan, and directly affects them. So being the idealists’ utopian types they are, they start to spread the ideology of rebellion when that utopian existence fails to materialize. Thus once a Marxist or Communist transformation of a society is complete, they are executed at that time. This being precisely the modus operandi of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot (just to name a few) who executed as many of them as they could find once they ascended to power. The tragic irony being they all ascended to power by exploiting those same Intellectual classes.

 

II:  The General Public, the Experienced, and No Nonsense Common Folk:

 

For those who are not what you would call the intellectual classes, the same principals above are fostered by the process of bringing about states of emotional knee jerk emotionalism. Bottom line is neurological speaking, and emotionally charged brain is an irrational brain. The human psyche is far better at tuning out and/or rejecting reality when it is placed in a state of emotionalism. Thus by resorting to Stoking the Emotion, you have placed the non-intellectual classes into that same state of subliminal and/or suggestiveness.

 

The reason why the emotionalism strategy is so diabolically effective in furthering nefarious causes and agendas is due to the psychological fact that all of us are born and genetically predisposed to certain Temperament Types. Although I’m not going to cite the entirety of Temperament types and what they are I will instead do a simple breakdown. All temperaments have the common denominator of an individual being born a “Feeler” (F, example ESFJ) or a Thinker (T, example ENTP).

 

A simple definition of T/F temperament dichotomy is this: Feelers (F) tends to innately process and store neural stimuli through the lenses of emotion, which already makes them not so good at understanding the rational side of that neural stimuli. They simply relate more to issues etc. presented in an emotional way. Likewise, this innate behavior usually means they will respond better to the “Idealistic” touchy/feely side of any concept, rather than the cold logic/rational/facts/data sides of the same concept.

 

Thinkers (T) on the other hand are the complete, absolute, and polar opposite of feelers (F). In all fact Thinkers tend to innately process and store neural stimuli through Logic, Reason, and Critical thought processes in general. They tend to divorce themselves from emotion, and come off as cold and unfeeling because of this innate behavior.

 

So an individual must honestly ask themselves: Which usually persuades me more, a good logical argument (T) or a strong emotional one (F)? Which usually persuades me more tangible information (hard data) or eloquence of speech (wordsmithing)?  

 

Thinkers and Feelers make decisions based upon different criteria, so, too, are they persuaded by different arguments. Feelers are naturally empathetic and value the feelings of others, even if they do not make sense or are not logical. Thinkers, on the other hand, are usually not convinced of anything unless it is logical. Feelings are valid, if they are a logical reaction to the circumstances.

 

Because of this difference, it’s not surprising that Thinkers and Feelers misunderstand each other so often. Feelers tend to be hurt more easily and more frequently, and Thinkers are often surprised and confused to learn they were responsible for making it happen.

 

Thinkers also pride themselves on their ability to rule fairly in disputes. They are keen on the principle of one standard or rule, applied fairly and justly to everyone. Even if they do not personally like the consequence of the ruling, they respect the idea of fairness above all. Feelers are much more concerned with mercy and harmony than they are with justice. So they look for and usually find the extenuating circumstances that necessitate the exception to the rule.

 

Thinkers don’t mean to be cruel, any more than Feelers mean to be dishonest. It’s just that, above all else, Thinkers value truth and honesty, and if that occasionally hurts someone’s feelings, so be it. Feelers highly value tact and diplomacy, and believe it should be used whenever possible to avoid causing anyone unnecessary pain or discomfort. If those methods fail to bring about an agenda, then they are prone to act out violently due to the emotional rage such failures will bring about.  

 

Here in lies the answer as to why the emotionalism strategy is so diabolically effective in overt and covert Psychological Warfare: Feelers (F) makes up approximately 2/3 (65-76%) of the populations of the world, whereas Thinkers (T) only makes up approximately 1/3 (24-35%) of the human population. As one world leader who shall remain nameless once said: “We don’t need 100% of the general public’s consent to pull this off, we only need a 2/3 majority of it.”

 

On a personal note, I’ve tried to write this up in a format so the average person can quickly grasp the overall concept being presented, and the human nature as to why it works so effectively by stoking the emotions in order to incite typical, predictable, and irrational emotional knee jerk reactionaries to violence.

 

There is only one way to counter the open psychological warfare. That is to be aware it is going on, and that it is specifically tailored to push your emotional discomfiture buttons for the sole purpose of disrupting your rational thought processes. It is an all out effort to make you succumb to emotionally induced bias and blindness rather than taking the time and efforts to rationally and clearly thinking issues through.

 

For the more Technical aspects of Psychological Warfare See:

 http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-05-30.pdf

http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-05-301.pdf

http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/guerilla.htm

 

***NOTE***

 

Mental Masturbation: The act of engaging in impractical, nonproductive mental exercise, thinking, writing through which a practitioner only comforts oneself mentally. Primarily due to the flawed belief their brilliance is unquestionable and without equal. Such acts don’t lead to any constructive results what so ever in the real world; In short, it’s just Bull Crap.

 

here is an interesting article that has been sent to me: