Why did Barry Soetoro decide to wave around his fake BC, claiming that it was the original copy from HDOH right now? Why was he trying to divert attention? There are a few theories, including his fear that people are listening to Donald Trump, and that the Jerome Corsi book would cause him a lot of damage.  However, there is probably another reason that he wanted to divert attention. It has to do with his father.

Taking Barry at his word, (although I still think Barry does not act like a man born as a Leo), that he was born August 4, 1961, means that I accept that Barry’s father is the randy Barack Obama Sr. It seems that Barry Sr. was a bit of a ladies man when he was away from home, especially with white radical women fawning all over him.

The UK paper The Guardian reports on the release of documents under FOI legislation to investigative journalist Heather Smathers. It seems that Barry Sr. was warned about his bed hopping when he was in Hawaii. The immigration dept was suspicious of the fact that he “married” an American citizen, and they were watching to see if there was evidence of them living together.  Also, it seems that Harvard was keen to get rid of their “star” Kenyan student when he had completed his exams, but not his thesis for his doctorate.

Rather than taking at face value the comment from the Guardian about how Obama Sr. was treated, I would suggest reading the underlying documents that are linked to the article. They are fascinating to say the least. He was involved with several young women at Harvard. The authorities were aware of the “marriage” and Barry’s birth. They also warn that the marriage might not be legitimate (thinking that perhaps it was a means to stay in the country).

It is clear that the document being waved about is not the long form birth certificate. It is a forgery, and not a very good one. This probably means that the real certificate held by Barry has been altered to the name Soetoro. Such an alteration would explain why he does not want it to be seen, and why he stated that his mother did not have the evidence to make a claim on Sr.’s estate, when in fact the Immigration department had very good documents on Barry Sr.

Could it be that Barry created the diversion to cover up the release of the documents relating to his father? I do not know. However, you can have a look at the documents at this link.


10 responses to “Obsfucation

  1. Excellent post! I’m still trying to get outside.

    Could it be that Barry created the diversion to cover up the release of the documents relating to his father?

    You might be on to something!

    GYEBALEKO (J BA LE KO) – Luganda for ‘Thank You For Your Work’
    My Personal Commenting Code


  2. Someone asked about layers?

    I am not yet sure what all the layering means. Sophisticated scanners and document processors will create layers from scanned documents trying to find text that can be tagged and searched – it also aids with compression. It looks like this when it happens. This one fact by itself is not necessarily a sign of fraud or malicious intent. I don’t think anything will be learned by analyzing this PDF file. Expert document analysts need to look at the original paper document that was scanned. More importantly, the actual documents in the vault in HI need to be examined. This is all just a double dose of hysteria. The white house in just throwing this piece of crap out there. And the rabid birthers focusing in minutiae. I think the upshot is that all this will be used as “proof” that the rabble will never be satisfied no matter what. Perhaps that is the grand plan?


  3. PS – having said that, it is quite clear that this document came from the same “factory” that produced the previous one(s). The specific complaint was that the “abstract” document did not LOOK like a birth certificate, it was in an unusual format. So all they did was reformat the same information and produce a “form” with lines and boxes, etc.

    So, basically, they “improved” the format but did not reveal any new content. Even ridiculous designations like “African” were preserved.


  4. PPS – you need to remember for the old days – if it is on Alex Jones, it is probably WRONG!


  5. “from”, not “for”.


  6. In other News:

    Via CNSNews.com —

    Three people convicted of crimes as a result of a terrorism-related investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) were later naturalized as U.S. citizens by the Obama administration, according to federal auditors.

    The March 2011 audit (released on April 21, 2011) by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), entitled Criminal Alien Statistics: Information on Incarcerations, Arrests and Costs, shows that three individuals were among “defendants where the investigation involved an identified link to international terrorism but they were charged with violating other statutes [not directly related to terrorism], including fraud, immigration, drugs, false statements, and general conspiracy charges,” referred by DOJ as Category II terrorism-related cases.


    Good Grief!!! What the hell else has gone on behind the public’s backs?


  7. @Carlyle,
    the Alex Jones expose was total crap. There are others who have pointed out the same thing.

    I think that you are basically correct, that it is the old form with some added information, including the name of a doctor.

    Like I pointed out in this piece, there is now stronger evidence that he was born in Hawaii that comes from immigration officials, but that thing he called a birth certificate does not pass the sniff test.

    Yes, African remains the big red flag… it is not the correct designation for race.


  8. CRB, I do not get it, why on earth would such low-life critters who have committed fraud and the like be naturalized? The department has gone nuts!!!


  9. One thing that we have determined is that the Hawaiian Dept. Of Health operates worse than a third world country.


  10. @Paxson, I agree. They are out of control in the way that they handle records.