Australia has its share of “sexist” scandals


I am well aware that some of my readers heard about the not so famous misogyny speech of the Crime Minister, Juliar Gillard. I will use it as the starting point to explain a series of scandals regarding not just sexist remarks, but total vilification of the other side in politics. Yes, I know you are all familiar with the vilification. If it is any consolation, both of them are usurpers.

There is some background to that infamous mysogny speech, and I think it is time that I wrote a little bit about that background to give some perspective to the outright hypocrisy of the ALP and their camp followers (look up the historical meaning of camp follower because it totally fits in with this whole scandal thing).

This story starts with Peter Slipper making a decision to leave the Liberal Party before he was ousted. The man who was chosen as candidate for Slipper’s seat is a man by the name of Mal Brough, and he is a former cabinet Minister in the Howard Government. He lost his seat in 2007. The Crime Minister offered Peter Slipper the role of Speaker in the House of Representatives. (this role is not the same as in the USA). She then forced the Speaker to resign and go to the back benches.  So far so good you think. Well……. it seems that there was a staffer in Slipper’s office who was ghey, a man by the name of James Ashby. This James Ashby was being sexually harassed by Peter Slipper. Ashby consulted with Mal Brough and he also consulted with a legal advisor regarding what had taken place. He had received some very offensive tweets.

The worst of those tweets was something that made me feel quite ill, and that is the comparison of womens’ intimate parts to muscles. Yuk. I find it hard to look at a picture of a muscle these days because I still have that extremely tacky comparison at the back of my mind.

The government put pressure on the Federal Court judge in order to get the legal case Ashby vs Slipper dropped. Like a good little ALP puppy dog, the judge hearing the case threw it out, on the grounds of politicking – in other words it was thrown out because James Ashby spoke to Mal Brough. The case was not thrown out on its merits.  This case is in the process of being appealed.

The offensive emails and tweets received some attention in the Parliament, and there was an attempt at a censure motion against Peter Slipper. This is when the Crime Minister went on her rant and blamed the Leader of the Opposition of misogyny.  Well, in my opinion that attempt to smear Tony Abbott was nothing but mushroom fodder!!

At Christmas time the ALP released an anti-Abbott Christmas card, depicting him as the Grinch. Although this is not sexually motivated, it is all part of the disgusting game played by the ALP.

So now we fast forward to March this year, and to Mal Brough having a private dinner for a group of 24 persons at a restaurant. The owner of the restaurant did a mock up menu and it included a Quail dish described as the Juliar Gillard KFC with a description that has sexual connotations.  Other politicians were also mentioned on the menu. The little jokes, athough they were tacky are in fact very mild, and you have to be very thin skinned to be offended.  Now the truth of the matter is that the restaurant owner did not produce that menu for the actual dinner, it was a mock up and a private joke between him and his son. However, the chef got hold of the “menu” and posted it to his Facebook page. Another former employee saw the posting and took a copy. He then passed it onto the ALP.

I note here that the individual who sent the thing to the ALP is an ALP supporter and he is also guilty of some rather disgusting derogatory tweets against Tony Abbott.  I do mean disgusting.

At the beginning of this week the Crime Minister launched her Women for Juliar Gillard campaign. Being a communist and an extremely divisive figure, as well as being a closet lesbian (she is AC/DC) the woman brought up late term abortion declaring it an issue for the election, and once again smearing the Liberal Party and Tony Abbott. She also decried men in blue ties. This last bit produced some hilarity because the former Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd has been doing his own pressing of the flesh in Sydney, and he turned up in a blue tie. As it stands the attempt to divide the population on the matter of abortion has been a very big flop.

So what does the Crime Minister do? Upon the advice of John McTurd (McTernan the Grub), the Crime Minister decides to bring up this fake menu. She holds a press conference. She demands that Mal Brough be disendorsed. She smears Tony Abbott. It was the Australia Day riot all over again with all of the false information going around.

The LameStream Media have been at their worst, especially the ALPBC, and the Fauxfax Press. Instead of apologising for the error that was made in regard to the fake menu, they have continued with the lie that the menu was real. This leads to the Age this morning where they ran a cartoon by Leunig which was truly disgusting in no uncertain terms. That cartoon was distributed to about 200,000 readers in Victoria. It seems that it is ok to place a cartoon in a National Daily newspaper with references to male genitalia with no apologies but it is not ok to refer to a quail!!

However, the hypocrisy of the ALP does not end with this cartoon. It seems that the ALP did in fact use and distribute a menu at a function that was many times worse than the menu in Queensland. This menu also had references to male genitalia, specifically the alleged genitalia of Tony Abbott and Joe Hockey, as well as a few others.  I have read what was in the cartoon as well as this other menu, and I can assure you that both were truly disgusting in tone.

There are other examples of hypocrisy and some of the stuff written by people on the Left is so disgusting that I do consider many of these people should be locked up!!

Never in my lifetime has the politics in Australia been so dirty. I detested Paul Keating but he was not as bad as the Crime Minister. I was not a fan of Bob Hawke, but he comes up smelling like roses compared to the Crime Minister. Then there is Gough Whitlam, the spendthrift, but the thing is Gough Whitlam never caused this kind of divisiveness within Australia. He never did any of these crude things either. In the past I have found that the women of the ALP tended to be extraordinarily crude. I admit to being shocked about some of the things that came out of their mouths, and that was back in the late 1960s!!

This woman is so thorougly disgusting. She should never have ended up in the role of Prime Minister. She is totally unworthy of the role, and due to her past there is no way she should have been trusted in the role of Prime Minister. At the moment she is travelling around Australia handing out money that she does not have, left right and centre. She is doing everything that she can to spike Tony Abbott and the Opposition. I know something about what they are doing behind the scenes but I cannot tell you about that (it is something that has me horrified for other reasons).

Advertisements

7 responses to “Australia has its share of “sexist” scandals

  1. How do we know The Truth these days?

    Simple answer: We don’t.

    We are being lied to consistently and frequently by the government. The MSM fail to cover significant major stories, at best, and at worst, outright mislead us.

    Is the new ‘revelation’ of Chemical Weapons in Syria the truth, or an excuse and a lie so the Crypto-Muslim-in-Chief can yet again succor the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Quaeda?

    Who knows???????????????

    I believe the following is true. What it means, I cannot say. Can you?

    REPORT: Man Behind Syrian ‘Chemical Weapons’ Claim is Fiction Writer Who Ran Benghazi Cover-Up

    Ben Rhodes, the White House national security advisor behind the claim that President Bashar Al-Assad used chemical weapons in Syria, is a fiction writer with zero educational background in government, diplomacy or national security who also played a key role in covering up the truth behind the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi.

    Yesterday, Rhodes announced that the White House had “high confidence” that the Syrian Army had used chemical weapons, providing no evidence, and that the Obama administration would now take steps to arm FSA rebels, who as has been widely documented are being led by Al-Qaeda terrorists who killed U.S. troops in Iraq. The Wall Street Journal also reports that a no fly zone is being prepared that would embroil the United States in yet another war.

    Hmmmmm – – –

    Like

    • There is one thing to take into consideration…. the news about the chemical weapons did not come from the USA but came from the UK at least one month ago.

      All the same I do not agree with helping the Syrian rebels now that Al Qaeda is involved.

      Like

  2. OK, here is a really hard one – – –

    Whom to believe?

    The lying scheming UN? or
    The lying scheming Obama?

    United Nations human rights investigators said they have gathered testimony from outside Syria suggesting that rebels, not Bashar Assad’s regime, may have used chemical weapons.

    “Our investigators have been in neighboring countries interviewing victims, doctors and field hospitals and, according to their report of last week which I have seen, there are strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof of the use of sarin gas, from the way the victims were treated,” Carla Del Ponte, a member of the independent commission of inquiry on Syria, told Swiss-Italian television. “This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities.”

    Like

  3. Wanna Puke?

    But you already knew this, right?

    It is WE that are the supposed terrorists, not THEM!

    http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/061213-659753-all-intrusive-obama-terror-dragnet-excludes-mosques.htm

    Like

    • That is an overkill of the situation. Benghazi has been in trouble for some time. However, the people of Benghazi will take up weapons again and fight the intruders when it all becomes too much. They have done that once when they chased Ansar al-Sharia out of Benghazi and they will do it again if they are provoked enough.

      Like