Category Archives: electoral reform

Mummy… they are being mean to me


During the past week there has been some attention focussed on the new campaign site: ATTACK WATCH… I am not going to link to a Soros funded site. The purpose of the site is for people to report their neighbours if they say anything wrong about Duh Won. It is a re-run of Fight the Smears. As you can imagine the site is backed by none other than Soros. According to one source the site references pieces from Media Matters as a response to comments about Østupid.

The first thing to note is that such a site invites totalitarianism. It is a really appalling idea that such a site should exist. However, conservative sites are turning this around, and they are having a lot of fun. Hillbuzz is one of the sites where they are reporting on the tweets to the attackwatch Tweet account which are quite literally making a mockery of the whole thing. Then Hitler got in on the act.

If it was not bad enough that you have a whole industry determined to make even the slightest criticism a matter of race, imagine what it is like in Australia when the little whiners from GETUP (probably Soros funded) the Marxist Watermelons aka the Green Party and the Marxist members of the ALP start whining that the red-haired witch (do substitute that w for a b), is being bullied.

I kid you not about the Dullard. She is really terrible. Thanks to her policies more than 12000 boat people have attempted to arrive in Australia. During the John Howard years there was a total of 288 “refugees” who landed in Australia. The policies of the Howard government worked, but the Dullard was responsible for the dismantling of those policies. The Dullard also instituted the BER program which is a cash cow for builders involved in building school halls or canteens or other small spaces at schools around the country at grossly inflated prices. Then there is: NBN (spending estimated at more than $50billion), cash for clunkers, set top boxes for pensioners at triple the price in the local supermarket, the pink batts program (a good idea if you want to set your house on fire – several people have been killed)… and the list of incompetence keeps getting longer.

However, let me address the really big scandal that has been unfolding in this country, but so far it has not managed to dislodge the MP who is at the heart of at least a part of the scandal. The Health Services Union provided an individual to give support to Østupid, and the person was paid by the HSU. I suspect that this is against your own campaign legislation but that one is a separate scandal.

There are two scandals that need to be mentioned. The first one involves Craig Thomson a former member of the Health Services Union. He used union funds to buy his way into winning a seat in the Federal Parliament (I am cutting that part of the story short), but he also used a credit card to purchase the services of prostitutes. On top of that he used the credit card on overseas trips and withdrew more than $100,000 in union funds. The wicked witch says that she has confidence in this particular shyster MP. This leads into the other brewing scandal: “What did she know and when did she know it” which concerns the Dullard herself – the woman, who has never been married (and who had an affair with a married man when she entered the Parliament) shacked up with another union man by the name of Bruce Wilson who was an official in the AWU. This particular man from West Australia had dealings with the Dullard in her job at the law firm Slater and Gordon. He got the Dullard to open an account that had the name AWU Welfare account. Wilson was a standover man and he funnelled funds that he got by standing over building site managements into that account. He purchased a house with those funds. The issues to consider here is whether or not there was a conflict of interest when Dullard was having sex with Wilson and representing him at Slater and Gordon. Her claim that she was young and naive does not fly because she was over 30 when she was having sex with the man and dealing with him at Slater and Gordon.

The current boyfriend of the witch who also occupies the  Lodge is a stupid man by the name of Tim Mathieson. Poor little Timmy thinks that the Dullard is being bullied by the conservative members of the Australian media. Mind you, there are not many conservative members of the Australian media, but Andrew Bolt is one of them. Timmy has his panties in a wad and he thinks that the Dullard is being “bullied”, just because she is a woman. I think it was also mentioned that women are harsher on the witch and that Dullard is being bullied by the Big Boys in town. What a load of codswallop!!

The women who voted “skirt” in this instance should be ashamed of themselves because Dullard has been so incompetent that she has given women in leadership a very bad name.

You can see the parallels between Østupid and this witch. Both of them are Marxists. Both of them usurped power. Both of them are lawyers, or at least went to law school. Dullard probably has the better working record. Both of them are incompetent fools. They are like two peas in a pod. However, the worst of the similarity is the attitude of both of them when it comes to forcing upon the people something that they do not want. In your case it was Abominablecare. In our case it is a tax on the air that we breathe, despite the fact that such a tax will doing nothing to change the climate!!  The legislation will be introduced next week. According to one source the same tactics are being used where there is not enough time to examine what is being put forward before a vote is taken. Talk about a nasty form of deja vu!!

The UK overwhelmingly votes against electoral reform


The UK has a voting system that is known as first past the post. This means that if you vote for an alternative candidate, then you just have to accept whoever wins. Nick Clegg and the Liberal Democrats had worked to get a change in the voting system to the alternative vote. This is the system used in Australia, where you fill in all the squares and the lowest candidates votes are then assigned to those higher up the chain until a winner is declared. That system has some advantages as well as disadvatages. It got us lumbered with the Marxist Julia Gillard as Prime Minister.

The UK went to the polls yesterday, and the result has been an overwhelming defeat of the AV reform. You can read about this vote here.

Yes Virginia there is an answer to the DOJ


I just saw this over at Pajamas Media. It has been written by J Christian Adams, the whistleblower from the Department of Justice voter division (ok so I do not have it quite right but it is close enough!!).

Basically, what is under discussion is that Georgia and now Texas have been leading the way when it comes to challenging the authority of the Department of Justice on much needed electoral reforms. However, it seems that Virginia has backed off, rather than taking a lead from Georgia.

Rather than allowing the DOJ to have control over their programs, Georgia has sued and the DOJ has backed off. It seems that there is a way to defeat the rather useless and disgraceful Eric Holder. His department seems to back off when they are sued in relation to what is really a state matter.

There is a lot that can be done to reform the voter system and to control the fraud, but it is hard to make suggestions when our systems are so different.  One of the big differences is the way in which people are registered to vote. It is done by one body which has offices in each state.  We actually get the form from the post office and send it to a postal address. 

When we had the election last year, a group that is very similar to the Soros funded MoveOn.org and its manifestations sued to allow for people to sign on at the last minute as voters. The way it played out there were a few thousand in critical electorates and if these votes had been fully accepted they would have affected the results in some cases. However, their votes became provisional only, they were not counted until the people verified their information. I kept an eye on some electorates where there were provisional votes and one thing I noted was that most were rejected. I only remember that in one electorate that the votes were accepted. I guess you could say that the people making the provisional votes were not willing to send their corroborating information. I am assuming that it was an effort to cheat and sway the election result.  However, overall, if this was the case it failed!!

I think that there needs to be a better form of voter identification. Yes, even over here it is needed. How else can you distinguish between two people who have the same name? How else can you try and stop the voter fraud?