Category Archives: Eric Holder the racist

Invoking executive privilege makes some pundits look again


The Daily Caller has an article on the left wing (although they call him moderate) David Brooks that indicates Mr. Brooks has been taking a second look at the POTUS without the rose coloured glasses. The money quote from Brooks is the following:

“I think politically it’s stupid, because it is one thing if you’re invoking  executive privilege over some national security issue. This is a policy  everybody admits was profoundly stupid. Why are you not saying, ‘OK, this was a  stupid policy, let’s get it out there and let’s figure out how it came about.’”
Read more:  http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/23/david-brooks-obamas-use-of-executive-privilege-politically-stupid-a-winner-for-the-gop/#ixzz1ykB8mlUA

This is interesting because David Brooks had been one of many who had been completely in the tank for the stupid one. It is a real turnaround.

Perhaps the invoking of executive privilege in this instance has woken up a few people who had been willing to sweep Fast and Furious under the carpet. From my point of view as a foreigner, in this instance the invoking of executive privilege actually suggests that the POTUS was in fact behind the disastrous scheme, and that it is not only Eric Holder who has been caught out in a web of lies.

 

Advertisements

Fast and Furious – the Congressional “testimony”


One woman from CBS has taken the lead in exposing Fast and Furious. It has now emerged that the purpose of Fast and Furious was a cover to push for the revoking of your Second Amendment. Of course this in itself is untenable. The question now is whether or not this can be tied to the White House, and in particular “the occupant” of the White House. To be sure he has been trying to work under the radar in order to force through legislation that will remove your gun rights.

The testimony of Eric Holder before the Congress has once again been theatre. The video of Holder responding to some of the questioning has shown a man who is feeling the heat, and I have to say he is a man who is clearly lying about what he knows, and when he knew it.

One person who gave a strong questioning performance was a Congresswoman who is a former FBI agent, by the name of Sandy Adams from Florida. Man, she was good. She really did some hitting below the belt and she was not taking any of the “proverbial” from Holder. He tried to avoid giving straight answers and she was having none of it. Her questions were very direct…. and Holder squirmed.

A new phase of this saga is opening up before us, and I think that unless Holder hands over his emails, that Issa will push a lot harder to get at the truth. For the first time “Impeachment” was mentioned. If Holder does not resign, then he could face impeachment in the near future. If that happens, I think that there are going to be fingers pointing to the White House.

Holder and Østupid have put their foot in it with their denials. Østupid has made statements that actually implicate Holder, and those statements, when examined closely will implicate Østupid as being the one who instigated the operation in the first place.

You can read some information at Hot Air. I will put up further links when I find some new ones.

There is another very good write-up and summary at Pajamas Media.

The Daily Caller has an excellent article on the Holder testimony before Congress. It details how Sandy Adams got Holder to admit that he emailed Lanny Breuer via his personal email account. The issue here is that none of the emails that have been handed over have Holder’s name on them. The Republicans are not being fooled by the stonewalling effort.

Speculation time: do you think it is possible that in the personal emails that are being withheld that Holder had been in contact with Østupid? I am raising this as a possibility because the stonewalling seems to indicate that Holder could be protecting more than himself. I honestly think that Fast and Furious was an idea that came out of the White House.

Noose tightens around Eric Holder’s neck


Ulsterman reports on the Darrell Issa Congressional hearings that are presently under way regarding Project Gunrunner.

The issue is the obstruction of justice by the Justice Department at the behest of Eric Holder. The subject of the inquiry is the sale of guns in 2009 that ended up in the hands of Mexican drugs cartels, and that were used against US law enforcement; it includes an inquiry into the death of agent Brian Terry who was killed by one of those guns.

During the first day of hearings the following phrases were mentioned: “cover-up”; “Watergate”; “Iran contra” with a table of real Constitutional scholars agreeing that the Regime’s DOJ was in violation of the right of Congress to make applicable requests for information.

Keep in mind that Eric Holder testified before Congress that he knew nothing of “Project Gunrunner”. If this was testimony under oath then you have the Bill Clinton situation that brought about Clinton’s impeachment in the Congress. This is a situation where it appears that perjury has been committed by an officer of the White House regime.

If ultimately it is proved that Eric Holder knew about Project Gunrunner and gave it the go ahead, on orders from someone higher up, then he will be gone because of that proven perjury (and it could not happen to a nicer, racist person).

 

Writing on the wall for Eric Holder?


The Daily Caller has an article relating Darrell Issa calling a hearing on whether or not the Justice Department has indulged in an obstruction of Justice. I think that we already know the answer to that question – YES, a thousand times YES.  This is a case related to the arms smuggling at the border, and not as I would hope the Black Panther case where there was a clear cut obstruction of justice by Eric Holder.

California Republican Darrell Issa has called a hearing to look at the possibility that the Department of Justice (DOJ) may be committing obstruction of justice by ignoring a subpoena.

On April 1, Issa, House Oversight Committee chairman, subpoenaed all documents pertaining to two Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) programs, Project Gunrunner and Operation Fast and Furious.

Specifically, Issa was looking for documents and communications “relating to the genesis” of the programs and any information related to the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. Two AK-47s ATF was tracking through Operation Fast and Furious were found at the scene of Terry’s death.

“The unwillingness of this Administration – most specifically the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms – to answer questions about this deadly serious matter is deeply troubling,” Issa said in a statement on April 1. “Allegations surrounding this program are serious and the ability of the Justice Department to conduct an impartial investigation is in question. Congressional oversight is necessary to get the truth about what is really happening.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/07/issa-calls-hearing-on-justice-department-possibly-obstructing-justice/#ixzz1OdLDfsdB