Monthly Archives: April 2011

Royal Wedding Fever

It is delightful to see Kate Middleton, the now Duchess of Cambridge, marry Prince William. The bride looked absolutely elegant in the chosen wedding dress. As an Australian I remain in two minds about the British monarchy. Australia has a Constitutional Monarchy arrangement for its government. We have our own Constitution.  The Governor-General is the Queen’s representative in the country, but we are sufficiently independent that our civil and criminal cases can no longer be presented to the House of Lords (this used to be the last part of any review). If Prince Charles ended up as King then I am sure that many more Australians would favour going all the way and becoming a Republic. You could say that the way he treated Lady Diana has a lot to do with our feelings on the subject. On the other hand, if Prince Charles and horseface are by-passed, and William became King of England, then we would remain content.

Kate’s wedding dress is absolutely gorgeous. The embroidery detail that can be seen in the picture here is an indication of the long hours put in by members of the British School of Needlework. The embroidery on the lace bodice and sleeves is also hand made. The shoes were also hand made by the same group of people.


I did not watch the wedding, but have seen snatches of the event, enough to state that Catherine Middleton made a beautiful and elegant bride. For many there was a comparison with Grace Kelly who became Princess Grace upon her marriage to Prince Rainier of Monaco. There were similarities in the bridal gowns. However, my mind was flying to another royal wedding, but in Denmark because our Australian, Mary McDonald married the Crown Prince of Denmark, Frederic. There was a similar elegance in the dress chosen by Mary for her wedding.

You might not be aware but Mary gave birth to twins at the beginning of the year – a gorgeous little girl and a handsome little boy. They have two other children.  Mary McDonald, like Catherine Middleton is a commoner. She grew up in Tasmania and she met Prince Frederic as a result of the Sydney Olympic games. It is all very romantic.

Even though this marriage is all pomp and ceremony, its an occasion that has brought joy to thousands of people. The majority of the British who were present in London to catch a glimpse of the happy couple, as well as the thousands of tourists had a very special day. This kind of event is quite uplifting for the British at this point in time. I doubt that it will cause the economy to turn around too much, but it will have a positive impact on the flow of funds as a result of tourism.

Prince William is a lovely young man. His visit to New Zealand and Australia after the disasters that we suffered last year and then earlier this year, showed a young man with a lot of maturity. It showed that he is easy-going, and that he takes the time to listen to people. Those who met the prince during his trip were very impressed, and some were extremely excited because William went out of his way to speak to them. It was the press stories on the TV about how Prince William conducted himself on this particular tour that had completely won me over. (I really hope that William becomes king rather than Charles).

Australians have lots of nice stories to tell about both Princes William and Harry. In fact on the way home from church I heard someone on the radio describing his meeting with young Prince Harry, and how he got an upgraded ticket on his flight to Australia which meant he was in the same cabin area as the prince. It sounds like Harry is every bit as charming as William. 


Daffy’s desperate propaganda

When a small group of people decided to protest the Gadhaffi regime in Benghazi during February 2011, having been inspired by protests in Egypt and Tunisia, they did not expect that Daffy goon snipers would fire upon them.  After the first were killed, more people joined the protests, until eventually thousands joined in… and then they managed to storm the Benghazi fort.  At this juncture they were joined by an army unit plus the interior minister who had defected to their side. It was the beginning.

The response to those initial protests in Benghazi was a springing up of protests in Zintan, Zawiyah, Tripoli, Misrata, Brega etc. etc. The protest movement was widespread. The response from the Daffy goons was deadly.  The uprisings in Tripoli were put down by the posting of foreign mercenary soldiers who were used as snipers – move outside the door, and get killed!!  The Daffy goons moved in on Zawiyah and the people held them off as long as possible. The situation was extremely deadly. This is the scene that was repeated in several regions in Libya. The protests were met with deadly force.

The UN became involved at the point where Daffy Duck had stated that he would show no mercy to the people of Benghazi, and he meant what he was saying. Just in the nick of time resolution 1973 was passed and the French  began the action against the Daffy goons, saving the people of Benghazi from further violence to their human rights. The UN has teams investigating the human rights violations in Libya and by the end of the investigation I suspect that many in the regime will face a trial in the world court for their crimes.

The action of the NATO forces has put a dampener on Daffy’s attempts to put down the protests. Daffy has been prepared to lie, and to get his allies to use propaganda against the NATO forces in an effort to cling to power. He has attempted to use the African Union, Chavez, Russia, China, India and other useful idiots in order to get out his propaganda message. It is always the same one: he pretends that NATO is killing civilians. Not once has the Daffy claims been verified. Even the statement coming from the Vatican was based upon false information that was planted by the regime. It was the alleged killing of civilians during NATO strikes that set off the Russians, and gave the leader of the Arab Union a bit of a hissy fit (he has since withdrawn opposition to the attacks once the record was set straight). He has been attempting to use Chavez to make claims that he is attempting to negotiate peace – why should anyone believe the lying hound Chavez? He tried to use the African Union to make peace negotiations, but of course these negotiations were rebuffed – Gadhaffi has to leave. He sent his Deputy Foreign Minister on a mission to Europe and that ended up with Italy deciding to send aircraft to participate in the NATO strikes.

Daffy Duck’s goons have been shelling the civilian areas of Misrata. Hundreds of civilians have died at the hands of the Daffy goons. He had Misrata cut off with the situation being quite desperate, but in the end the goons were pushed back sufficiently for the rebels to retain control of the city, as well as maintaining the control of the port. There have been some evacuations from Misrata, and yes, some equipment has filtered into the town.  However, it is the use of cluster bombs and now the mining of the waters around the port of Misrata that should make people recoil in horror over what Daffy Duck has been doing to his own people in Libya.

These deadly actions by Daffy Duck has not stopped the propaganda from flowing. There has been a never ending flow of propaganda. At first there were promises of a ceasefire. Oh yes, did I mention that when NATO threatened action Daffy declared a ceasefire, and promptly ignored it by firing upon Benghazi? This has been repeated several times in the past few weeks. Now comes the latest in propaganda ploys from Daffy Duck:

He wants to negotiate yet another worthless ceasefire. He wants NATO to stop the bombing.  Here is the latest in a string of lying propaganda from the terrorist Moammar Gadhaffi:

“(Libya) is ready until now to enter a ceasefire … but a ceasefire cannot be from one side,” Mr Gaddafi said, speaking from behind a desk and aided by reams of papers covered in what appeared to be hand-written notes.

“We were the first to welcome a ceasefire and we were the first to accept a ceasefire … but the crusader NATO attack has not stopped,” he said.

“The gate to peace is open.”

What a lying piece of the proverbial mushroom fodder. Truly, this is the man who claims a ceasefire, and then keeps firing. It is not NATO that has refused to stop it is Moammar Gadhaffi who has been stalling for time in order to implement his next diabolical attack upon his own people who will not stop.  The man is getting more and more desperate and he is sounding extremely desperate. He blames NATO, but NATO was not responsible for those mines that have been found in the waters of Misrata!!!!! The mining of the port of Misrata is against International Law, something that is not respected by the terrorist and terrorist sponsor, Moammar Gahdaffi.

The BBC, reporting on the same story gives a slightly different and chilling picture regarding the latest propaganda move from Daffy Duck:

State media later implied that Nato strikes had targeted Col Gaddafi while he was speaking.

Meanwhile, Libya said it will not allow any more sea deliveries to the besieged western city of Misrata.

Government spokesman Moussa Ibrahim also said rebels in the city would be given four days to lay down their arms in return for an amnesty.

If they continued to fight they would face “total fire” he said.

His comments came after Nato said forces loyal to Col Gaddafi had been trying to lay mines off Misrata.

These threats are exactly like the “no mercy” threats uttered against Benghazi. Don’t talk to me about the possibility of some individuals been remotely connected to AQ who are now fighting to save the lives of their townspeople, their families and even their own lives.  The freedom fighters are fighting for their lives, and they are fighting the real terrorist who has used obsfucation like it is a fine art. After all, who do you think started those AQ rumours? It was Daffy Duck who was giving a false impression about those who had been protesting.

 You will find more disturbing stories about how the Daffy Duck regime is treating people in Tripoli here.

Evidence that AQ is behind bomb in Marrakesh

The BBC news site has a report on the bombing of the cafe in Marrakesh in Morocco. The reason for following these reports is to get some idea of what is taking place in other regions of the Middle East and Africa. It really does seem like that thare is a very big uprising on the way, and it is not going to lead to the westernisation of the Middle East…. we would be very foolish to see this as a push for western style democracy.

The protests in Morocco were never really all that big and it was more than likely that those behind the Moroccan protests were members of AQ.  This bombing is further evidence that AQ is active in Morocco and is planning to up the ante. So far no one has taken responsibility for the cafe bomb. However, it has the hallmarks of AQ complete with the nails being packed into the bomb so that its effect is all the more devastating. Three days prior AQ did make threats against Morocco.

Any upping of the ante in any of these African and Middle East countries is not good news because it means that those who desire to take over and be tyrannical themselves are attempting to gain the ascendancy. I shudder to think what could happen so long as Østupid remains in the White House. Things are hotting up. It is worse than when Carter was President, which was the last time that so much of the Middle East and Africa was a real hot bed of discontent.


Border Patrol

I bet you Americans will be jealous when you read this report about what is happening on the border of Libya and Tunisia. I am joking of course, but it was something that caught my eye:

The fighting in Libya spilled over into neighboring Tunisia early on Friday, as troops loyal to Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi routed rebel fighters at a critical border crossing in the southwest and pursued them into the nearby town of Dehiba, said a rebel fighter who witnessed the events.

The fighting in the southwest began Thursday night and raged into Friday morning, as a “very large force” of Qaddafi soldiers began attacking the strategic Libyan border post at Wazen, a rebel military spokesman, Col. Ahmed Omar Bani, said. The rebels are hoping to use the border post as a supply route for their fighters battling Colonel Qaddafi’s troops in Libya’s western mountain region.

After capturing the crossing from rebels, the Qaddafi loyalists, backed by mortar fire, advanced further on Friday morning into Dehiba, about three miles from the border. The rebel fighter said the Libyans then sent seven pickups into the town but they were halted at a roadblock set up by residents and Tunisian army troops.

The first truck flipped over at the roadblock, he said, while the other six veered off into the desert, where they were stopped by Tunisian troops, who then took the Qaddafi militiamen into custody. It was not immediately clear what the Tunisian army did with the prisoners.

What I find interesting in the report is that the Tunisian army stood with the people and turned the Daffy goons away. They also captured some of them. This is a border incident, but it is a very serious incident because the Libyan Loyalists  crossed the border and were taking action. This could be seen as an escalation of hostilities. It can also be seen that Tunisia is on the side of the civilian population that is being bombarded and fighting for their lives.

Now wouldn’t it be nice if the Mexican army was patrolling the borders in the south of your country so that the drug cartels and the other riff raff could be kept on their side of the border. The action of the Tunisian army should be enough to make you jealous!!

However, on a more serious, and I would say very serious side, in the same report is some very disturbing information regarding Misrata. No, I am not talking about possible Islamists fighting for the lives of their families (who knows there might be a few in Misrata), but I am talking about something far more deadly and serious:

As the two sides fought, Misurata’s troubles appeared to deepen further as NATO said that pro-Qaddafi forces had been caught Friday mining the waters around the harbor, an apparent attempt to harass traffic from the sea, which has been the sole lifeline for a city otherwise cut off by loyalist ground troops.

While pursuing four small boats, NATO forces noticed an object that appeared to be a mine being released into the sea, and later discovered at least two mines in the water, according to an official who asked not to be named in line with the alliance’s policy.

At least one vessel with humanitarian aid scheduled to enter the port on Friday delayed its arrival and waited off the coast for permission from NATO, medical officials in the city said.

Supplies from the sea have been integral to the city’s survival during the two-month siege, as internationally chartered aid ships have delivered food, water, medicine and ambulances, and also evacuated thousands of migrant workers and many wounded Libyans in need of treatment not available in the city.

 ^&*((#####  the air is turning blue as I consider the action here. There are humanitarian ships entering the port of Misrata to pick up stranded immigrants and the wounded. So these Daffy Loyalists have decided to mine the harbour!!!!  Unbelievable.


Why did Barry Soetoro decide to wave around his fake BC, claiming that it was the original copy from HDOH right now? Why was he trying to divert attention? There are a few theories, including his fear that people are listening to Donald Trump, and that the Jerome Corsi book would cause him a lot of damage.  However, there is probably another reason that he wanted to divert attention. It has to do with his father.

Taking Barry at his word, (although I still think Barry does not act like a man born as a Leo), that he was born August 4, 1961, means that I accept that Barry’s father is the randy Barack Obama Sr. It seems that Barry Sr. was a bit of a ladies man when he was away from home, especially with white radical women fawning all over him.

The UK paper The Guardian reports on the release of documents under FOI legislation to investigative journalist Heather Smathers. It seems that Barry Sr. was warned about his bed hopping when he was in Hawaii. The immigration dept was suspicious of the fact that he “married” an American citizen, and they were watching to see if there was evidence of them living together.  Also, it seems that Harvard was keen to get rid of their “star” Kenyan student when he had completed his exams, but not his thesis for his doctorate.

Rather than taking at face value the comment from the Guardian about how Obama Sr. was treated, I would suggest reading the underlying documents that are linked to the article. They are fascinating to say the least. He was involved with several young women at Harvard. The authorities were aware of the “marriage” and Barry’s birth. They also warn that the marriage might not be legitimate (thinking that perhaps it was a means to stay in the country).

It is clear that the document being waved about is not the long form birth certificate. It is a forgery, and not a very good one. This probably means that the real certificate held by Barry has been altered to the name Soetoro. Such an alteration would explain why he does not want it to be seen, and why he stated that his mother did not have the evidence to make a claim on Sr.’s estate, when in fact the Immigration department had very good documents on Barry Sr.

Could it be that Barry created the diversion to cover up the release of the documents relating to his father? I do not know. However, you can have a look at the documents at this link.


Not just a useful idiot – he is a %*#^ing idiot

Who might I mean when I call him a f’ing idiot? (sorry air just turned blue) I mean none other than that other useless weak former POTUS Jimmah Carter. It seems that Jimmah took himself a trip to North Korea for talks, as a member of a team of “elites of the world”. They did not get an interview with Kim Jong-Il but they did get a message that blames both South Korea and the USA for human rights abuses against North Korea. Did you hear that?

Now let’s try getting some facts straight because Jimmah is really nothing more than a useful idiot when it comes to dealing with these tyrants and dictators. He learned nothing from his gross mistakes over Iran. Remember it was Carter who allowed Ayatollah Khomenei to return from exile in Paris to Tehran, and in fact it was Carter who benignly thought that having this “religious” man in charge of Iran was a good thing. (No wonder the air turns blue when I think about what this idiot allowed to happen in Iran). 

Now it seems that Jimmah wants to dictate to South Korea over North Korea, and to accept the false accusation of human rights abuses being levelled by that malevolent dictator Kim Jong-IL. He does not seem to understand that North Korea chose to build up arms, rather than provide food for the people who might or might not be starving. This is the real crux of the issues that should be raised. If North Koreans are starving, why is Kim Jong-Il wasting so much money on building up nuclear weapons? Feeding the people should come first. 

Any blockade that might exist is the fault of North Korea, but as is typic of these dictators, King Jong-Il is trying to blame South Korea for his own attitudes. In fact Kim Jong-Il is trying to cause a new war between South and North Korea. These elites who are running around the world sniffing their own odour and thinking that they are “king mushroom fodder” need a good dose of reality because they are going to aid and abet a new war through their enabling of dictators such as Kim Jong-il. Somebody should tell Jimmah to just shut up and go sit in the corner!!



Layers upon layers – definitely not an official document. is a good site to visit in order to check out how the latest forgery was done.

Since I do not have the necessary software, I cannot comment on whether or not these folks are being accurate, however, I have done scanning of simple things (yes and made a real hash of the job!!). Somewhere in my books etc. I have documents sent to me from the Victorian registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages relating to members of my family – their births and deaths, and some marriages. These records were kept in bound volumes.

Now some might dispute the point that I am going to make, and without being able to find and scan one of those documents, I cannot prove what I am saying, however, what I noticed, and why I concluded almost immediately that this new document was a fake, comes down to the top corner where it is supposed to look like a scanned image from a bound volume.

If you look closely at the top corner you will see a black hole, then along the edge there is an image of what looks like a document that is next to this one. Now here is the problem that I have with accepting that this is an image that has come from a bound volume:

If the volume is a thick book it is hard to get a good digital or photocopied image. What you do get when it is scanned is a lot of black. If you do not have the book lined up correctly you get a lot of black (trust me, I know!!!). If the book does not lie down flat you will often find that a portion of what you were wanting to copy does not get copied!!!

Here is an experiment where I have used my scanner to copy a page from a knitting book:


I scanned my image the wrong way, the first time, and then I scanned it the other way.  At the top you can clearly see that my page is from a bound volume.  Now have another look at the latest B.C. image at the top corner, and look how it seems to be almost like a hole has been cut and this item inserted to make it look like it has come from a bound volume. I could be wrong with what I am saying so please chime in.